Debate about a wide scope of political issues at the federal or state level, domestic and international US policy.Impact of those policies in our quality of live.
HomePortalGalleryFAQSearchRegisterLog in

Display results as :
Rechercher Advanced Search
free forum

Do you think the 911 events were an inside job , with full involment of Bush cabinet over the attack to our own people?
I believe was an inside job, the evidence is out there.
Obama and the Death Panels. I_vote_lcap81%Obama and the Death Panels. I_vote_rcap
 81% [ 25 ]
I don't believe in conspiracy theories, but I understand some government agencies were trying to hide theirs errors.
Obama and the Death Panels. I_vote_lcap3%Obama and the Death Panels. I_vote_rcap
 3% [ 1 ]
Whoever believe in the Inside job theory is out of his mind.
Obama and the Death Panels. I_vote_lcap13%Obama and the Death Panels. I_vote_rcap
 13% [ 4 ]
I'm not informed enough to made an educated choice.
Obama and the Death Panels. I_vote_lcap3%Obama and the Death Panels. I_vote_rcap
 3% [ 1 ]
Total Votes : 31
Who is online?
In total there is 1 user online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 1 Guest


Most users ever online was 53 on Thu Dec 19, 2013 10:48 pm
Place your ad here


 Obama and the Death Panels.

Go down 

Posts : 127
Join date : 2009-08-18
Location : Tampa,Fl

Obama and the Death Panels. Empty
PostSubject: Obama and the Death Panels.   Obama and the Death Panels. EmptyTue Nov 03, 2009 7:12 pm

A provision for an end-of-life “death panel” in Barack Obama’s health care reform plan, brought to light by former Alaska governor Sarah Palin, already exists in legislation passed earlier this year under the Stimulus Bill.
H.R. 1 (more commonly known as the Recovery and Reinvestment Act, or the Stimulus Bill) contains US $1.1 billion in funding for the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research. The Council is the brain child of Tom Daschle, who lost the nomination for Health and Human Services Secretary due to an unpaid tax scandal. Daschle is also co-author of the book Critical: What we can do about the Health Care Crisis, in which he not only outlines the details of the Council but advocates for the rationing of medical care based on age and other qualifiers. He also argues that Americans ought to be more like Europeans who passively accept “hopeless diagnoses.”

Daschle’s stated purpose (and therefore President Obama’s purpose) for creating the Council is to empower an unelected bureaucracy to make the hard decisions about health care rationing that elected politicians are politically unable to make. The end result is to slow costly medical advancement and consumption.
“Daschle says health-care reform ‘will not be pain free,’ writes former New York lieutenant governor Betsy McCaughey. “Seniors should be more accepting of the conditions that come with age instead of treating them.”
One prominent member on the Concil is Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, the brother of White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. Dr. Emanuel has written the following bone-chilling statement on why health care should be rationed for the elderly:
Unlike allocation by sex or race, allocation by age is not invidious discrimination; every person lives through different life stages rather than being a single age. Even if 25-year-olds receive priority over 65-year-olds, everyone who is 65 years now was previously 25 years.
As American Thinker writer Joseph Ashby properly concludes:
On average 25-year-olds require very few medical services. If they are to get the lion’s share of the treatment, then those 65 and over can expect very little care. Dr. Emanuel’s views on saving money on medical care are simple: don’t provide any medical care. The loosely worded provisions in H.R 1 give him and his Council increasing power to push such recommendations.
The impending bureaucracy needed to regulate such loosely-defined legislation is mind-boggling to say the least. This will leave Obama’s Regulatory Czar, Cass Sunstein, to play a major role in defining the government’s role in controlling medical care.
How does Sunstein approach end of life care? In 2003 he wrote a paper for the AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies arguing that human life varies in value. Specifically he champions statistical methods that give preference to what the government rates as “quality-adjusted life years.” Meaning, the government decides whether a person’s life is worth living. If the government decides the life is not worth living, it is the individual’s duty to die to free up welfare payments for the young and productive.
Sunstein is also romantically linked to Harvard professor Samantha Powers, who was forced to resign from the Obama campaign for calling then-rival Hillary Clinton a “monster” in The Scotsman newspaper. In addition to being 15 years younger than Sunstein, Powers is a vocal anti-Israeli activist who is reportedly an adviser to now US-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Middle East policy.
“They’re definitely an item. He was at her book party on Friday night and said as much during a speech he gave on her behalf,” wrote Above The Law in February 2008.

"The men the American people admire most extravagantly are the greatest liars; the men they detest most violently are those who try to tell them the truth."
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
Arthur Schopenhauer
Back to top Go down
Obama and the Death Panels.
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
» President Barack Obama may visit Sri lanka
» Chicken death inevitable

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Capitol Hill Inquirer :: U.S Domestic policy :: ObamaCare: Health Care Bill-
Jump to: