Debate about a wide scope of political issues at the federal or state level, domestic and international US policy.Impact of those policies in our quality of live.
HomePortalGalleryFAQSearchRegisterLog in

Display results as :
Rechercher Advanced Search
free forum

Do you think the 911 events were an inside job , with full involment of Bush cabinet over the attack to our own people?
I believe was an inside job, the evidence is out there.
 81% [ 25 ]
I don't believe in conspiracy theories, but I understand some government agencies were trying to hide theirs errors.
 3% [ 1 ]
Whoever believe in the Inside job theory is out of his mind.
 13% [ 4 ]
I'm not informed enough to made an educated choice.
 3% [ 1 ]
Total Votes : 31
Who is online?
In total there is 1 user online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 1 Guest


Most users ever online was 53 on Thu Dec 19, 2013 10:48 pm
Place your ad here

Share | 

 A key court victory against FDA crusade against vitamins and suplements.

Go down 

Posts : 127
Join date : 2009-08-18
Location : Tampa,Fl

PostSubject: A key court victory against FDA crusade against vitamins and suplements.   Wed Sep 16, 2009 3:24 am

Courts Tell FTC To Stop Censoring Science

Natural health and integrative medicine recently won a court victory, and it is worth taking a bit of time to understand what it means.

The FTC (Federal Trade Commission) filed an action in federal district court asking that Lane Labs be held in contempt for violating a 2000 consent order to refrain from making representations regarding the effect of any health product without being able to support those claims with reliable scientific evidence. The FTC filed this action even though Lane Labs had submitted compliance reports including extensive scientific backing for any claims made. After remaining silent for 6 years, the Agency suddenly petitioned the court to hold Lane Labs in contempt despite all the company’s efforts.

The court ruled in favor of Lane Labs. It held that the government failed to meet its burden of providing clear and convincing evidence that Lane Labs made claims without credible evidence to back them up. Key to the court’s decision was the fact that two expert witnesses testified as to the credibility of the claims made by Lane Labs. The opposing views presented by the expert witnesses for the FTC and for Lane Labs amounted to what the court considered a difference of opinion, not enough to meet the evidentiary burden required to grant the government’s motion. This outcome may seem self-evident to an impartial observer, but courts often seem reluctant to rule against government agencies.

Why it was the FTC this time
The Food and Drug Administration and the Federal Trade Commission are different agencies with overlapping authority over the advertising of dietary supplements. Basically, the FTC is responsible for enforcing laws that prevent manufacturers from making misleading, false, or fraudulent claims about their products on product packaging or in advertising. The FDA is responsible for enforcing laws that prevent manufacturers from selling adulterated (impure) or misbranded product. But the FDA’s definition of misbranded is very loose and even includes the dissemination of truthful scientific evidence. Even a true statement in the FDA’s eyes may be classified as “false” and thus misbranded. So in many cases, either the FTC or the FDA may object to the same statement. In the case of Lane Labs, it was the FTC which was claiming false advertising.

Structure/function claims and what they meant for this case
Structure/function claims are claims about a product’s effect on the structure or function of the body. Food and dietary supplement manufacturers are explicitly allowed by statute to make such claims (thanks to legislation which this organization helped pass) without having to worry about their product being classified as a drug. “Supports the immune system” is an example of a structure or function claim. The claims made by Lane Labs were structure/function claims, not disease claims that would have required FDA approval.

What This Ruling Means For Manufacturers
It is not up to the FTC to decide what represents credible scientific backing for a claim. The agency must be reasonable and where diverse interpretations of scientific evidence represent differences of opinion rather than discredited positions, government policy must allow for that diversity instead of suppressing points of view it disagrees with.

This organization is engaged in a similar battle right now with the FDA, suing the FDA for violating the first amendment rights of members to make certain qualified health claims. The court’s rebuke of the FTC should apply to the FDA as well: if manufacturers are making honest claims and have proof to back them up, no government agency should prevent them from communicating information to consumers.

"The men the American people admire most extravagantly are the greatest liars; the men they detest most violently are those who try to tell them the truth."
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
Arthur Schopenhauer
Back to top Go down
A key court victory against FDA crusade against vitamins and suplements.
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
» Supreme Court determination on ‘Expropriation Bill’
» About Touchwood court case?
» Sri Lanka court issues notice to parliamentary committee that probed Chief Justice
» EPF court case over.
» Today is CIFL court case day?

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Capitol Hill Inquirer :: Health Care :: FDA policy: Trojan Horse against american people-
Jump to: