Capitol Hill Inquirer
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.


Debate about a wide scope of political issues at the federal or state level, domestic and international US policy.Impact of those policies in our quality of live.
 
HomePortalGallerySearchLatest imagesRegisterLog in
ENROLL AS A MEMBER TO ENJOY QUICK ACCESS TO HARD TO FIND INFO. BE THE MOST INFORMED! ENROLL TODAY, WE WANT TO HEAR YOUR VOICE!
Search
 
 

Display results as :
 
Rechercher Advanced Search
Navigation
 Portal
 Index
 Memberlist
 Profile
 FAQ
 Search
Affiliates
free forum
 


Poll
Do you think the 911 events were an inside job , with full involment of Bush cabinet over the attack to our own people?
I believe was an inside job, the evidence is out there.
Federal judge rules police cannot detain people for openly carrying guns I_vote_lcap81%Federal judge rules police cannot detain people for openly carrying guns I_vote_rcap
 81% [ 25 ]
I don't believe in conspiracy theories, but I understand some government agencies were trying to hide theirs errors.
Federal judge rules police cannot detain people for openly carrying guns I_vote_lcap3%Federal judge rules police cannot detain people for openly carrying guns I_vote_rcap
 3% [ 1 ]
Whoever believe in the Inside job theory is out of his mind.
Federal judge rules police cannot detain people for openly carrying guns I_vote_lcap13%Federal judge rules police cannot detain people for openly carrying guns I_vote_rcap
 13% [ 4 ]
I'm not informed enough to made an educated choice.
Federal judge rules police cannot detain people for openly carrying guns I_vote_lcap3%Federal judge rules police cannot detain people for openly carrying guns I_vote_rcap
 3% [ 1 ]
Total Votes : 31
Who is online?
In total there are 4 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 4 Guests

None

Most users ever online was 147 on Thu Apr 08, 2021 8:33 am
Place your ad here

 

 Federal judge rules police cannot detain people for openly carrying guns

Go down 
AuthorMessage
Admin
Admin
Admin


Posts : 127
Join date : 2009-08-18
Location : Tampa,Fl

Federal judge rules police cannot detain people for openly carrying guns Empty
PostSubject: Federal judge rules police cannot detain people for openly carrying guns   Federal judge rules police cannot detain people for openly carrying guns EmptySun Sep 20, 2009 9:06 pm

On September 8, 2009, United States District Judge Bruce D. Black of the United States District Court for New Mexico entered summary judgment in a civil case for damages against Alamogordo, NM police officers. The Judge's straight shootin' message to police: Leave open carriers alone unless you have "reason to believe that a crime [is] afoot."
The facts of the case are pretty simple. Matthew St. John entered an Alamogordo movie theater as a paying customer and sat down to enjoy the movie. He was openly carrying a holstered handgun, conduct which is legal in 42 states, and requires no license in New Mexico and twenty-five other states. Learn more here.
In response to a call from theater manager Robert Zigmond, the police entered the movie theater, physically seized Mr. St. John from his seat, took him outside, disarmed him, searched him, obtained personally identifiable information from his wallet, and only allowed him to re-enter the theater after St. John agreed to secure his gun in his vehicle. Mr. St. John was never suspected of any crime nor issued a summons for violating any law.
Importantly, no theater employee ever ordered Mr. St. John to leave. The police apparently simply decided to act as agents of the movie theater to enforce a private rule of conduct and not to enforce any rule of law.
On these facts, Judge Black concluded as a matter of law that the police violated Matthew St. John's constitutional rights under the Fourth Amendment because they seized and disarmed him even though there was not "any reason to believe that a crime was afoot." Judge Black's opinion is consistent with numerous high state and federal appellate courts, e.g., the United States Supreme Court in Florida v. J.L. (2000) (detaining man on mere report that he has a gun violates the Fourth Amendment) and the Washington Appeals Court in State v. Casad (2004) (detaining man observed by police as openly carrying rifles on a public street violates the Fourth Amendment).
Mr. St. John's attorney, Miguel Garcia, of Alamogordo, NM was pleased with the ruling and look forward to the next phase of the litigation which is a jury trial to establish the amount of damages, and possibly punitive damages. Garcia said that
"[i]t was great to see the Court carefully consider the issues presented by both sides and conclude that the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from detaining and searching individuals solely for exercising their rights to possess a firearm as guaranteed by our state and federal constitutions."
Notably, Judge Black denied the police officers' requested "qualified immunity," a judicially created doctrine allowing government officials acting in good faith to avoid liability for violating the law where the law was not "clearly established." In this case, Judge Black concluded that
"[r]elying on well-defined Supreme Court precedent, the Tenth Circuit and its sister courts have consistently held that officers may not seize or search an individual without a specific, legitimate reason. . . . The applicable law was equally clear in this case. Nothing in New Mexico law prohibited Mr. St. John from openly carrying a firearm in the Theater. Accordingly, Mr. St. John's motion for summary judgment is granted with regard to his Fourth Amendment and New Mexico constitutional claims. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is denied with regard to the same and with regard to qualified immunity."
Judge Black's opinion and order is welcome news for the growing number of open carriers across the United States. Though police harassment of open carriers is rare, it's not yet as rare as it should be - over the last several years open carriers detained without cause by police have sued and obtained cash settlements in Pennsylvania, Louisiana, Virginia (see additional settlement here), and Georgia. More cases are still pending in Ohio, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania.
Judge Black's opinion and order can be read here.
Back to top Go down
https://capitolhillbriefing.forumotion.com
 
Federal judge rules police cannot detain people for openly carrying guns
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» G20 Police Assault on Woman - G20 Police Assault on Female Protestor - G20 Police Assault on Woman
» Judge Halts Flu Vaccine Mandate For Health Workers
» Police Assault on Civilian Passing by G20 protest
» NWO plans to create a Police State and the coming flu pandemic.
» VIDEO: WeAreChange Schools Pittsburgh Police on Constitution

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Capitol Hill Inquirer :: U.S Domestic policy :: Gun Control.-
Jump to: