Debate about a wide scope of political issues at the federal or state level, domestic and international US policy.Impact of those policies in our quality of live.
HomePortalGalleryFAQSearchRegisterLog in

Display results as :
Rechercher Advanced Search
free forum

Do you think the 911 events were an inside job , with full involment of Bush cabinet over the attack to our own people?
I believe was an inside job, the evidence is out there.
 81% [ 25 ]
I don't believe in conspiracy theories, but I understand some government agencies were trying to hide theirs errors.
 3% [ 1 ]
Whoever believe in the Inside job theory is out of his mind.
 13% [ 4 ]
I'm not informed enough to made an educated choice.
 3% [ 1 ]
Total Votes : 31
Who is online?
In total there is 1 user online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 1 Guest


Most users ever online was 53 on Thu Dec 19, 2013 10:48 pm
Place your ad here

Share | 

 Media Mocks Cyberbullying Bill

Go down 

Posts : 127
Join date : 2009-08-18
Location : Tampa,Fl

PostSubject: Media Mocks Cyberbullying Bill   Tue Oct 06, 2009 4:57 pm

After Wednesday's hearing on the cyberbullying bill (HR 1966) in the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, internet media, including The New York Times, has lost little time expressing skepticism even mockery of the Anti-Defamation League's internet hate bill.

Popular Science says HR 1966 "leaves reason at the door" as it "attempts to criminalize cyber-bullying with vague language that butts up against free speech rights in a wide range of ways." But it derisively believes Congress will probably pass the bill since "we can trust Congress to make the craziest, least practical choice."(1)

In an article entitled "Dangerous Opinions Ahead," ECN Magazine says that, in a rare instance, both the left and right stand opposed to HR 1966. "Make no bones about it-the proposed legislation is a serious assault on first amendment rights...overreaching an ambiguous piece of legislationTheoretically, the law would prevent about 99% of political discourse-anyone feeling offended could claim "emotional distress." This is a steep infringement of first amendment rights. We cannot hope to legislate how people think." (2)

The New York Times editorial "Vague Cyber-Bullying Law" comments: "Lawmakers should enact laws that can withstand challenge to give prosecutors tools to go after bullying of all kinds. What prosecutors cannot do is stretch federal law to label run-of-the-mill Internet activity as criminal." (3) says 1966 "was met with little enthusiasm by a House subcommittee on WednesdayFrom the outset of the 90-minute hearingcommittee members from the left and the right said they thought the measure was an unconstitutional breach of free speech. "We need to be extremely careful before heading down this path," Bobby Scott, a Democrat from Virginia and the committee's chairman, said during the hearing's opening moment." (4)

What America saw in the House committee hearing on Wednesday was the torpedoing of the cyberbullying bill (and probably the AWARE bill) by expert Constitutional authorities. I believe both these bills are now burning, listing badly, and likely to go down. My opinion is shared by the Judiciary expert of one of the most powerful House Republicans. He said, "I hate to make predictions, but any bill that receives as cool a reception in the crime subcommittee is probably doomed."

We may be experiencing a great victory not only over the cyberbullying bill but also its companion, AWARE, HR 3630, which would fund to the tune of $125 million over five years the cyberbullying bill's message to schoolchildren in America: Any "intention" to criticize homosexuality over the internet that causes "substantial emotional distress" to homosexuals is criminal, worthy of two years in prison.

This initial negative response also dooms ADL's Safe Schools Improvement Act, HR 2662, which was scrubbed from Wednesday's hearing, replaced by the more subtle AWARE bill. HR 2662 would criminalize "repeated and persuasive" criticism of homosexuality in the public school system, describing it as "violence."

Three ADL hate bills possibly down! --- and this after Dr. James Dobson turned off the Christian/conservative resistance this spring, pronouncing that nothing could be done to defeat hate crimes legislation, except pray!

In fact, the religious right, neutralized by Dobson and Family Research Council in the hate bill fight and directed instead toward healthcare protest and revenge on the Democrats at midterms next year, remains virtually oblivious even to the existence of these dangerous bills. Result: It has done next to nothing to oppose them. Only the National Prayer Network has been in the forefront of opposition to them, marshaling encouragement to Republicans this week through heavy calling.

Are we done fighting? We have only begun to fight and win! Stay tuned for my next weekend article in which I explain how each of us can endeavor to repeat this success again and again in the upcoming hearings against ADL's monster hate crimes law for the workplace: ENDA.



Let the Anti-Defamation League teach you how they have saddled 45 states with hate laws capable of persecuting Christians, and spearhead attempts to pass the federal hate crimes bill: <>

"The men the American people admire most extravagantly are the greatest liars; the men they detest most violently are those who try to tell them the truth."
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
Arthur Schopenhauer
Back to top Go down
Media Mocks Cyberbullying Bill
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
» Market Edges Down As The T-Bill Yields Move Higher!!!
» Sri Lanka’s Treasury bill rates moves up at the weekly auction
» Sri Lanka Central Bank to sell down Treasury bill stock: Governor
» Sri Lanka man dies of heart attack after shocking electric bill
» Treasury bill auction held on 20 November 2013

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Capitol Hill Inquirer :: United States In Crisis :: Censorship, Valium for your elected Congress officials.-
Jump to: